Treaty of Versailles and change of diplomatic history Research Paper

Treaty of Versailles and change of diplomatic history - Research Paper Example This left Great Britain and Russia. The latter was not mostly contented with the territorial settlements coming from the peace agreement2; however, in any case Russia’s national issues and exclusion policy prevented her from fulfilling a European function of any importance.3 Great Britain, the only nation which could have been capable of playing a dynamic role, was more interested with her colonial or imperial relations, which implied that she favored to perceive the activities of Europe with subtle apathy4 when it was in her interest to do so. Therefore, the question is why did the United States refuse to shoulder the European responsibility and redirect the future of Europe? The involvement of the United States in the war and the ambitious plans of Woodrow Wilson for Europe originally bode favorably for the future. However, the United States was afterward to fulfill a vague function in the European affairs. She declined to approve the Treaty of Versailles, refused to promote the League of Nations, deserted the support for Europe with virtually rude haste, and turned down recommendations to connect inter-allied war liabilities and compensations.5 Furthermore, even though the United States recognized a belief in the vitality of the resurgence of Europe, her economic strategy frequently contradicts the interests of societies in Europe, for instance on subjects of financial, immigration, and tariffs regulation.6 It is a fact that the attitude of the United States towards Germany was more indulgent or relaxed than that of France or Britain, yet this merely functioned to provoke France since it tendered modestly in the issue of defense against a disobedient and wayward Germany.7 The isolationist policy of the United States towards Europe should be understood within the framework of her political system. In April 1917, the United States had joined the war hesitantly.8 After the end of aggressions there was a series of protests against hostilities and military actions, alongside a reluctance to intervene in the affairs of other nations which could result in more hostilities.9 This mainly explains the reason United States discovered herself in an inferior form of martial vigilance at the occurrence of World War II. Nevertheless, the Versailles Treaty, even though regarded as a failure, remains one of the most important events in history that radically changed the development of diplomacy. This essay will discuss in detail the above premise. Woodrow Wilson and the Versailles Treaty Of all the problems connected with the peace of Versailles, the figure of Woodrow Wilson looms as the object of the most enduring controversy. From the Fourteen Points to the minutest traits of his personality, Wilson has been intensively subjected to both critical and sympathetic scrutiny10 A vast number of people still believe that the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations are two distinct mechanisms. This, apparently, is inaccurate. The League of Nat ions Covenant was integrated as Section I in the Versailles Tr